← Leaderboards

Analytics

Predicting.top: compare the metrics behind trader ranks

Predicting.top adds context to raw-profit rankings. The interface has Polymarket, Kalshi, Opinion and Myriad views, time windows and individual performance fields alongside a composite score.

Open Predicting.toppredicting.top
Available on
Web
Pricing
Rankings are publicly accessible. API and premium prices are not established.
Availability: public

Screenshots and interface

What is Predicting.top?

The published weighted model combines consistency, return, win rate, maximum loss and profit factor. Read component weights to understand which behavior the score rewards; a high rank summarizes observed history rather than forecasting future returns.

Cross-venue PnL is not automatically comparable. Capital, coverage, periods and accounting conventions can differ. Inspect a selected trader’s exposure and record and distinguish provider definitions from independently reconciled returns.

Who it is for

  • Researchers comparing traders across venues.
  • Users seeking more context than raw profit.

Features and coverage

  • Venue and period selection

    Choose a venue and available window before comparing traders.

  • Individual performance

    Read PnL, ROI, win rate and other displayed statistics rather than relying only on rank.

  • Weighted methodology

    Inspect consistency, return, win rate, maximum loss and profit-factor components and their weights.

Workflows with Predicting.top

Compare like with like

Use one venue and period, comparing absolute PnL with return metrics and exposure.

Inspect the model

Read the weights and decide whether the rewarded behavior matches the research question.

Pricing and total cost

Rankings are publicly accessible. API and premium prices are not established.

Access: Public leaderboard access does not require a trading connection.

Getting started

Before you start: Composite ranks depend on definitions and data coverage.

  1. Choose the venue and period.
  2. Compare individual fields and the weighted score.
  3. Inspect the trader’s exposure and record before interpreting the rank.

The public leaderboard requires no trading connection; the score remains provider-defined.

Useful links

What to check

  • Composite ranks depend on definitions and data coverage.
  • Wallet returns have not been independently reconciled.
  • Capital, periods and accounting can differ across venues.

A closer look

Ratings & reviews

Editorial rating
3.5/ 5
0 user reviews

Our take on Predicting.top

Visible components broaden trader research beyond a profit total. Cross-venue comparability and calculation accuracy still need verification, and the composite score should be read as a historical model rather than durable skill established by rank.

Based on documented features, setup and access terms. How we rate

User reviews 0

The main score switches to user ratings after 5 published reviews.

Be the first to share your experience

A specific example helps the next person choose the right tool.

Related tools

Browse category

Frequently asked questions about Predicting.top

Does the score predict future returns?

No. It summarizes historical observations under the provider’s weights.

Can raw PnL be compared directly across venues?

Only with care: capital, coverage, period and accounting conventions may differ.

Is a trading connection required?

No. The ranking is publicly browsable; API and premium terms are separate unknowns.