PredictionToolkit logoPredictionToolkit
Language: English
Search tools
← Dashboards

Analytics

Artemis Prediction Markets

Artemis makes Prediction Markets a sector entry point alongside its broader financial datasets. AI Analyst can carry a narrowly defined research question into tables, charts and supported exports, provided the returned coverage and definitions match the intended comparison.

3.5/ 5Editorial ratingEditorial assessment
Open the Prediction Markets sectorwww.artemis.ai
Available on
Web

Screenshots and interface

Product preview1 / 2

Public provider demonstration with the prediction-market example selected, not a result generated in a review account.

What is Artemis Prediction Markets?

Open the sector, specify venues, metric, dates and units, and inspect what the dataset actually covers before treating the result as a complete market comparison. Analyst can combine prediction-market questions with other financial data and export supported results to spreadsheets, CSV, PDF or slides. Evidence and field definitions still need review before recurring use.

Research allowances and spreadsheet access differ by plan. Investor includes a spreadsheet allowance, whereas the standalone Plugin has its own price and larger call budget. The recorded sector review encountered sign-in requirements; public images are provider demonstrations and pricing views, not authenticated results or a data-completeness test.

Who it is for

  • For researchers combining prediction-market context with other financial datasets and exportable results.
  • For spreadsheet users comparing Investor’s included allowance with a separate Plugin subscription.

Metrics and coverage

  • Sector navigation and AI questions

    Open Prediction Markets from the sector list and ask Analyst about its dataset alongside other financial data.

  • Research exports

    Export supported tables and charts to spreadsheets, CSV, PDF or slides after reviewing sources and definitions.

  • Plan-specific spreadsheet workflows

    Paid spreadsheet plans provide formulas with separate call allowances; confirm the required fields before incorporating them into a recurring model.

Analysis workflows

Frame a sector comparison

Specify venues, metric and time window, then check coverage rather than assuming the sector view is exhaustive.

Build a checked comparison table

Ask a narrowly scoped Analyst question, review its evidence and definitions and export in a supported format.

Choose spreadsheet capacity

Choose the included or standalone spreadsheet product for the required call budget and confirm data fields before recurring use.

Pricing and total cost

Intern is free; Investor is $100/month, Managing Director is custom-priced and the standalone Plugin is $500/month per user. The Plugin is separate from Investor’s included spreadsheet allowance.

Intern

$0

  • Limited Analyst queries, charts and tables; daily limits and supported research exports

Investor

$100/month

  • Higher usage without daily query limits; Excel/Google Sheets with 50,000 calls/month

Managing Director

Custom quote

  • Team usage and custom data; discuss API, MCP and Snowflake access with the team

Standalone Plugin

$500/month per user

  • Spreadsheet workflows, 1M Sheets calls/month and API access

Fees and usage costs

  • A follow-up Analyst question counts as another query.

Data inputs and access

  1. Open Prediction Markets and sign in if the selected view requires it.
  2. Define venues, dates and units for the question, inspect the result and export after checking coverage and sources.

Explore Analyst features

Useful links

What to check

  • The recorded review covered public demonstrations and pricing. Authenticated sector research, data completeness and trading performance were not tested. Dataset access and allowances remain plan-dependent.
  • Account or subscription requirements depend on the selected feature.

A closer look

Ratings & reviews

Editorial rating
3.5/ 5
0 user reviews
PredictionToolkit editorial

Our take on Artemis Prediction Markets

A documented path from sector questions to charts and spreadsheets is useful, with clear plan distinctions and a free entry tier. Coverage and actual account access must still match the specific research question; this is a documentation assessment rather than a trading or data-quality benchmark.

Assessment criteria
Task usefulness, documented scope, setup clarity, and access and cost transparency.
Assessment date
Documentation reviewed

Documentation-based assessment. How we rate

User reviews 0

The main score switches to user ratings after 5 published reviews.

Be the first to share your experience

A specific example helps the next person choose the right tool.

Related tools

Browse category
DefiLlama Polymarket protocol page with TVL, fees, revenue and volume
DefiLlama Prediction Markets
Analytics4.0Editorial

Compare venue activity and investigate Polymarket history with explicit metric and product definitions.

  • Access Web

Use a public sector table and protocol methodology for direct metric comparison.

Blockworks Polymarket overview with open-interest and volume charts
Blockworks Polymarket Analytics
Analytics3.5Editorial

Volume, open interest and participation charts with market, category and lifetime-volume wallet segments.

  • Access Web

Compare dedicated Polymarket market and wallet-segment charts.

DesiUtils tracker showing outcome probabilities, price bars, market status and category filters.
DesiUtils Polymarket Tracker
Analytics3.0Editorial

A free, account-free dashboard of 50 high-volume Polymarket questions and their outcome probabilities.

  • Access Web

Also in Dashboards and Charts.

Frequently asked questions about Artemis Prediction Markets

Is the standalone Plugin the same as Investor’s spreadsheet access?

They are separate products with different prices and call allowances. Investor includes 50,000 monthly calls; standalone Plugin lists 1M Sheets calls/month and API access.

Was the authenticated research tested?

No. The record supports a documentation-based assessment and public provider demonstrations, not a data-quality benchmark.