PredictionToolkit logoPredictionToolkit
Language: English
Search tools
← Trading terminals

Trading terminal

AntFlow: evaluate documented order and automation workflows

AntFlow describes a hosted consumer workspace for market discovery, manual orders, position accounting and optional paid automation. It is distinct from the separately catalogued Python client library.

2.5/ 5Editorial ratingEditorial assessment
Access and advertised plansantflow.live
Availability: waitlist

Screenshots and interface

Product preview1 / 2

Provider PnL, speed and execution examples do not constitute verified account results.

What is AntFlow?

The landing page requests early access, while public help pages describe onboarding. Documentation alone does not establish current account or trading entitlement. Marketing terminal previews, latency and PnL examples are provider material rather than independently verified execution or returns.

Custody descriptions need reconciliation: the landing page uses non-custodial language, but setup describes a generated deposit wallet, encrypted server-side key handling and export. Those statements do not establish a verified local-signing or non-custodial workflow.

Who it is for

  • Traders assessing a hosted order and position workspace.
  • Researchers checking automation controls, custody and fee layers before onboarding.

Features and coverage

  • Manual desk

    Documentation describes market search, linked buy-pair orders, partial position reduction, accounting and order-lifecycle controls.

  • Optional paid strategies

    CPA and FHM are separated from manual trading, with configuration limits; strategy performance remains a provider claim.

  • Dry-run and live switch

    Getting Started describes per-user dry-run automation and a separate switch to live orders. Simulated fills must remain distinct from live execution.

  • Risk and cost controls

    Help pages describe itemized fill fees, slippage, exposure limits and a circuit breaker. Illustrative PnL is not an account record.

Workflows with AntFlow

Compare access paths

Read early-access conditions, account prerequisites and Free/Pro differences together before considering manual or paid automated use.

Review a simulation

Inspect dry-run behavior, strategy limits and stop controls without treating simulated fills as live orders.

Reconcile total cost

Compare the platform tier, the market’s venue fee, spread and slippage separately rather than relying on a blanket fee statement.

Pricing and total cost

Published plans advertise Free at $0 and Pro at $100/month. Free platform fees are 1% maker and 2% taker per fill; founding/active paid members are listed at 0% AntFlow fees. Early-access and founding conditions need confirmation.

Free

$0 advertised; 1% maker / 2% taker platform fee per fill

  • Documented market browsing and manual desk
  • Current account and execution entitlement not established

Pro

$100/month advertised

  • Documented AI discovery and automation
  • 0% AntFlow platform fee for active paid members under the fee page

Fees and usage costs

  • Platform fees are not the complete execution cost. AntFlow help’s blanket zero-native-fee statement conflicts with Polymarket’s category-specific venue fee information; venue fees, spread, slippage and other applicable costs remain separate.

Access: Public documentation is readable, but the landing page requests early access.

Getting started

Before you start: Non-custodial marketing and server-side key setup need reconciliation.

  1. Read the early-access notice and account/wallet setup documentation.
  2. Compare Free/Pro entitlement, AntFlow fees and applicable Polymarket fees.
  3. Study simulation, position limits and stop controls before considering account or trading evaluation.

Waitlist access, account entitlement and custody/signing behavior are not established by the public help pages.

Account and simulation setup

Polymarket venue fees

Useful links

What to check

  • Non-custodial marketing and server-side key setup need reconciliation.
  • Zero AntFlow fees do not mean zero venue or all-in execution cost.
  • Strategy, latency and PnL claims are not independently verified.
  • Public documentation does not establish successful simulated or live execution.

A closer look

Ratings & reviews

Editorial rating
2.5/ 5
0 user reviews
PredictionToolkit editorial

Our take on AntFlow

Detailed order, simulation and cost documentation supports a preliminary assessment. Early-access restrictions, unresolved key-handling language and conflicting native-fee claims limit what can be concluded about the hosted product before account-level evaluation.

Based on documented features, setup and access terms. How we rate

User reviews 0

The main score switches to user ratings after 5 published reviews.

Be the first to share your experience

A specific example helps the next person choose the right tool.

Related tools

Browse category
amparo terminal and local-signing overview
amparorestricted
Trading terminal3.5Editorial

Compare supported venues, inspect local signing and use modular access with separate funding and contract checks.

  • Trading mode Manual
  • Access Web

Also in Trading Terminals.

Bullpen multi-asset interface in the provider’s product overview.
Bullpen
Trading terminal3.5Editorial

A web terminal for prediction markets, tokens and perpetuals, with explicit order types and collateral tracking.

  • Trading mode Manual
  • Access Web

Compare another trading workspace and its separate custody, venue and access terms.

polymarket-api-python quickstart and public book reads
polymarket-api-python
SDK3.5Editorial

Read markets and liquidity metrics in Python, maintain CLOB streams and add trading only when needed.

  • Language Python

The Python client is developer tooling with a different purpose; no required integration is asserted.

Frequently asked questions about AntFlow

Can the full app be used immediately?

The landing page requests early access. Readable onboarding docs do not establish current trading entitlement.

Does a zero platform fee remove all costs?

No. AntFlow’s fee layer is separate from category-specific Polymarket fees, spread, slippage and other costs.

Is non-custodial operation verified?

No. Marketing and setup differ: setup describes a generated deposit wallet, encrypted server-side keys and export. The actual custody and signing flow remains unverified.

Are marketing PnL examples evidence of returns?

No. Provider interface examples do not independently establish strategy performance or actual account results.